Spring 2025 Colloquium Series
About
This series is jointly hosted by the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science (MCPS), the Program in History of Science and Technology, and the Program in the History of Medicine. Each semester we invite scholars from around the country and the world to present on scholarship in the history and philosophy of science, technology and medicine.
Seminars will not be held on the following dates:
- 2/28/25
- 3/7/25
- 3/14/25
Lectures begin at 3:35pm in 216 Pillsbury Drive (formerly Nicholson Hall), Room 125 on the East Bank of the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities campus.
At this time, all events will be in-person unless otherwise stated. Some events may be subject to change. Please check back for updates or contact [email protected] for more information.
Learn more about MCPS-sponsored lectures.
Earlier Colloquium
Paul Kreitman, January 24, 3:35 p.m.
***CANCELED***

Whitney Barlow Robles, January 31, 3:35 p.m.

Henry Cowles, February 7, 3:35 p.m.
History, University of Michigan

Sandra Mitchell, February 14, 3:35 p.m.
***CANCELED***

Jared Richman, February 21, 3:35 p.m.

Callie H. Burt, March 21, 3:35 p.m.

Laura Hirshbein, March 28, 3:35 p.m.

Sarah Cameron, April 4, 3:35 p.m.
Title: Elusive Water: The Life and Death of the Aral Sea
Abstract: In 2017, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called the disappearance of Central Asia’s Aral Sea “probably the biggest ecological catastrophe of our time.” But in the more than sixty-year period that the sea has been shrinking, one theme has remained consistent: The disappearance of the sea has been represented largely as an environmental problem (the loss of the sea, the changes to the landscape) rather than as a human catastrophe deeply intertwined with these environmental shifts. People got pushed out of the story. We still don’t understand exactly how many people have fled the Aral Sea lands or where they went. And even as local residents have kept on dying, there have been almost no serious studies of the disaster’s impact on human health. This talk will explain how and why the people of the sea came to be marginalized. It analyzes how this process of peripheralization (which spans three different political systems, Russian imperial rule, Soviet rule, and post-Soviet rule) shaped and continues to shape the disaster’s course. And rather than framing the Aral case as a uniquely Soviet story, the talk considers what we can learn from it, as we confront similar cases of shrinking bodies of water around the globe.

Haixin Dang, April 11, 3:35 p.m.
referee reports are only read by the authors and editors. In contrast, open peer review can occur either pre- or post-publication, and the referee reports are published alongside the paper. Sometimes, the referees' identities are never blinded, or their identities are revealed at publication. Does open peer review result in better, more rigorous science? In this talk, I argue that this question should interest philosophers of science and that philosophy of science can
offer unique insights into the value of transparency. I will argue that transparency is not always a pure epistemic good. Transparency is costly. In fact, transparency and honesty can trade off against each other in surprising ways. Understanding these trade-offs can help us design better peer review systems that align with the epistemic goals of science. In conclusion, I argue for a pluralistic approach to reforming peer review in science.

Paul Brinkman, April 18, 3:35 p.m.
the saving of species over the taking of specimens.

Yang Li - April 25, 3:35 p.m.
Department of History and Integrated Liberal Studies, UW-Madison
