Fall 2025 Colloquium Series

About

This series is jointly hosted by the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science (MCPS), the Program in History of Science and Technology, and the Program in the History of Medicine. Each semester we invite scholars from around the country and the world to present on scholarship in the history and philosophy of science, technology and medicine.

Seminars will not be held on the following date(s): 

  • 11/14/25
  • 11/27/25
  • 12/12/25

Lectures begin at 3:35pm in 216 Pillsbury Drive (formerly Nicholson Hall), Room 125 on the East Bank of the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities campus. 

At this time, all events will be in-person unless otherwise stated. Some events may be subject to change. Please check back for updates or contact [email protected] for more information. 

Learn more about MCPS-sponsored lectures.

Earlier Colloquium 

Honghong Tinn, September 12, 3:35 p.m.

History of Science and Technology, University of Minnesota
 

Title: Island Tinkerers and Incompatible Computer Dreams: Contested Computer Exports from Taiwan to the United States in the 1980s

Abstract: Tinn's first book, Island Tinkerers: Innovation and Transformation in the Making of Taiwan and Computing Industry, tells a critical history of how Taiwan rose to global prominence in high tech manufacturing. From computer maker to the world’s leading chip manufacturer, Taiwan boasts the likes of Acer, Foxconn, Asus, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). Island Tinkerers argues that local technologists—a group of technology-savvy professionals, technocrats, technology users, and engineers-turned-entrepreneurs—led the transformation of Taiwan from a former Japanese colony and defeated Chinese Nationalist’s last fortress to a country that calls itself the Silicon Island. Over six decades, Taiwanese technologists tinkered; they engaged in a process of technology transfer in which acts of imitation, emulation, experimentation, and innovation overlapped with one another. Their improvised attempts and astute innovations were critical to their commitment to ensure the technological system of computers was rooted in new soil.
 

Drawing from the chapter 8 of her book, this presentation critiques the constructed images of Taiwanese companies as invaders and counterfeiters, portrayed by the US media and congressional hearings participants in the late summer of 1983. The misrepresentations indicate that the US computer industry, media, and analysts failed to make sense of founder of Acer Computer Stan Shih’s success in the microcomputer market; they believed that the only way Taiwanese computer makers could succeed was by counterfeiting. However, the influence of Stan Shih and his fellow Taiwanese computer manufacturers, such as MiTAC, was growing. They became sought-after subcontractors for prestigious tech corporations around the world in the second half of the 1980s. In 2006, Intel’s CEO, Paul S. Otellini, highlighted Stan Shih’s contributions, stating that he is “a big reason why your PC costs $1,000, not $10,000” in a Time magazine article titled “Asian Heroes: Stan Shih.”

Island tinkerers book cover with link to article about the book.

 

William Goodwin, September 19, 3:35 p.m.

Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida
 
Title: Kuhn’s speciation metaphor and the birth of biochemistry
 
Abstract: Biochemistry is an intersectional field: it, “arose by division and recombination of specialties already matured.” This means that standard Kuhnian models of discipline formation cannot be expected to apply in the case of biochemistry. Kuhn’s later account of discipline formation is by analogy to acts of evolutionary speciation, with ‘incommensurability’ playing the role of an isolating mechanism. Since ‘incommensurability’ seems to play no role in the formation of biochemistry, this paper attempts to generalize and extend Kuhn’s speciation analogy thus making a considerably more interesting and plausible general account of discipline formation and eliminating any essential appeal to ‘incommensurability’ in that account.
 
MCPS logo

 

Victor Boantza, September 26, 3:35 p.m.

 History of Science and Technology, University of Minnesota
 
Title: Imaginative Mechanism: Elements, Fluids, Engines, and the role of Analogical Reasoning in Robert Boyle’s Natural Philosophy 
 
Abstract: The emergence of the experimental philosophy and what has been famously labeled “the mechanization of the world picture” are hallmarks of the Scientific Revolution. Yet the relationship between these two uniquely seventeenth-century attitudes to nature are not easy to depict or grasp. Heir to both René Descartes’s mechanistic cosmology and to Francis Bacon’s campaign for an “operative natural philosophy,” the works of Robert Boyle (1627–1691) exemplify the tensions between these two trends while representing a creative effort to combine them. The talk considers the multifaceted role of the imagination and analogical reasoning in this endeavor, focusing on Boyle’s use of mechanical, anatomical, physiological, and chymical forms of imagery. 
 

Boyle sought to link macro-level phenomena, encountered in everyday empirical reality, with the domain of unobservable micro-particles in motion, on the one hand, and the barely graspable cosmological realm, on the other. “Imaginary” in this sense is not synonymous with or reducible to “speculative,” although the categories overlap in interesting ways. In the 1670s, Boyle proclaimed that “the World being but, as it were, a great piece of Clock-work, the Naturalist as such, is but a Mechanician; however the parts of the Engine … be some of them much larger, and others much minuter, than those of Clocks or Watches.” Seductively clear, the universe-as-clockwork metaphor has since commanded most attention, but it is Boyle’s reference to the engine and its parts that reveals important aspects of his natural philosophy. Boyle utilized “engine” as a pliable trope encompassing inanimate and animate entities and their interrelations at the micro, macro, and cosmological levels. 

Fluids, I argue, were a crucial link in this metaphysical and epistemological chain. Cosmologically ubiquitous fluids like water, air, and fire sustained the world like humors and spirits animated living bodies. Boyle’s view of fluidity and fluids as “intermediate causes,” located between observable phenomena and universal mechanistic principles, carved out a space for fertile analogical reasoning that challenged received standards of scientific intelligibility and distinctions between mechanisms and organisms. Informed and constrained by human experience, imagination, and language, Boyle’s conflicted yet inventive efforts redefined the interplay between matter theory and experimental practice, natural philosophy and natural history, tradition and innovation. 
 

Imaginative mechanism image

 

Matthew Wisnioski, October 3, 3:35 p.m.

Science, Technology, and Society, Virginia Tech
 
Title: What’s Wrong with Innovation?: A History of the Rise and Fracture of Innovation Culture
 
Abstract: The consensus that innovation drives American progress has cracked. For over half a century innovation served as a universal good. While the imperative to innovate for a better future continues to fuel systemic change around the world, critics now assail innovation culture as an engine of inequality or accuse its do-gooders of woke groupthink. What happened? 
 

This talk investigates how innovation—a once obscure academic term—became ingrained in our institutions, our education, and our beliefs about ourselves. I reveal the central role of a new class of experts in spreading toolkits and mindsets from the cornfields of 1940s Iowa to Silicon Valley tech giants today. This group posited that “innovators” were society’s most important change agents and remade the nation in their image. The innovation culture they built transcended partisan divisions and made strange bedfellows. I’ll discuss how Kennedy-era policymakers inspired President Nixon’s dream of a Nobel Prize for innovators, how anti-military professors built the first university incubators for entrepreneurs, how radical feminists became millionaire consultants, how demands for a rust belt manufacturing renaissance inspired theories of a global creative class, how philanthropic encouraged girls and minority children to pursue innovative lives, and why the innovation consensus is now in dispute.

Every American an Innovator cover

 

Lukas Rieppel and Craig Howe, October 10, 3:35 p.m.

History, Brown
 
Title: In and Out of Place
 
Abstract: During the second half of the 19th century, the United States dispatched legions of survey geologists to Lakotan treaty lands, where they were tasked with mapping the location and abundance of valuable resources for economic extraction. In addition, scientists also unearthed countless prehistoric fossils in the Badlands of what are now South Dakota and Nebraska, which were then accessioned to the “permanent collections” of museums in urban centers such as Chicago and New York. As they journeyed across the United States, these fossils were stripped of their original meanings and inserted into a new, teleological narrative about the evolutionary history of life on earth. By composing Earth histories that were billed as the one true creation story, survey geologists effectively sought to assert mastery over the deep history of newly colonized lands. In this presentation, we make a case for why prehistoric fossils taken from Lakotan treaty lands should be returned. In addition, we also provide a sketch for a new kind of exhibit featuring contemporary Lakotan artists alongside the material remains of prehistoric animals as a case study for how to interpret fossils from American Indian lands. This exhibit will focus on the lands, philosophies, and citizens of a specific tribal nation whose ongoing presence is central to a fuller understanding of the fossilized bones of animals currently on display all over the world, the site where they had been for millions of years, and their journey to imperial museums of natural history.
 
Brontothere

 

Katie Plaisance, October 17, 3:35 p.m.

Departments of Knowledge Integration, Philosophy and Psychology
University of Waterloo, Canada

Title: What makes philosophy-STEM collaborations successful and why do they matter? Perspectives from scientists and engineers
 
Abstract: Collaboration is a powerful way to exchange knowledge and generate novel ideas. In this talk, I present data from a survey of almost 200 STEM researchers—and in-depth interviews with 20 scientists and engineers—all of whom have collaborated with philosophers of science. Participants discussed the extent to which they felt their collaborations were successful, what made them successful, and the benefits their collaborations produced. Our research highlights the importance of interpersonal factors in making collaboration work and the capacity-building benefits of working across disciplines. These findings should be of interest to philosophers, STEM researchers, and anyone studying interdisciplinary collaboration.
MCPS logo

 

Elizabeth Petrick, October 24, 3:35 p.m.

History, Rice University
 
Title: Embodiment and Mobility in Online Technologies: From Computerized Conferencing to Tablets
 
A Charles E. Culpeper Lecture in the History of Medicine
 
Abstract: How do we understand the role of the body when people communicate with each other using computer technologies? Since the beginning of computer networks, the use of computers for human communication has been talked about with almost utopian understandings of disembodiment, of the computer allowing for human bodies to disappear as people interacted in digital space. But, of course, the body is always still present. This talk draws upon two case studies, decades apart, in order to locate and center the human body when people are communicating online. 
 

The first involves computerized conferencing: an early networking technology through which researchers considered some of the first questions of online social participation. Notably, researchers employed people with disabilities as research subjects, with the understanding that this technology might one day enable greater social participation without needing to move about the built environment. It would be a digital space where all were equal, as text on the screen, with aspects of bodily identity hidden from view.

The second case concerns the Sony Magic Link, a portable tablet-like computer of the mid-1990s that employed a highly metaphorical graphical interface where users wrote postcards to each other and traveled through digital spaces in order to perform activities like going online. In this example, the user’s body becomes both metaphor and physical, moving through a digital world while the user carries the device with them through the real world. 

In both cases, bodies are the site where the material world intersects with digital space. Bodies embrace technology and welcome digitization, in certain ways, while pushing back and resisting it in others. It is through the body that digital interaction becomes possible, and therefore the promise of greater access to social participation becomes real, but in ways where the body can become obscure and immaterial.
 

Hiltz - EIES terminal

 

Jasmin Özel, October 31, 3:35 p.m.

MCPS, University of Minnesota
 
Title: Natural kinds for psychology: A multi-level mechanistic proposal
 
Abstract: The homeostatic property cluster framework for natural kinds has proven useful across various scientific contexts, particularly those requiring multiple levels of explanation. In this framework, natural kinds are considered clusters of co-occurring properties sustained by underlying homeostatic mechanisms, such as biological species exhibiting shared traits (property clusters) maintained by genetic and evolutionary processes (homeostatic mechanisms). This talk discusses and develops the recent application of this framework to psychological constructs, emphasizing its capacity to integrate cognitive science, neuroscience, and neuropsychiatry explanations that inform our understanding of mental phenomena.
 
MCPS logo

 

Lan Li, November 7, 3:35 p.m.

History of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
 
Title: Invisible Anatomy: Meridians and Math in Chinese Medicine
 
Abstract: This talk is based on Body Maps: Improvising Meridians and Nerves in Global Chinese Medicine, which reframes generic anatomical images by considering illustrations of invisible structures as maps. Body Maps offers a long global history of medicine through hand-drawn body maps and spans across the tenth to the twentieth centuries to re-think cultures of objectivity beyond normative geographies of science and medicine. In this talk, I focus on the graphic form of a tu 圖 as a historical category of technical images to understand how illustrations of lines guided diagnostic and therapeutic practice. Scholars often debated whether to discursively interpret these lines as meridians, channels, or tracts; practitioners often debated whether these lines merely visualized nerves to articulate needling and heating practices. Specifically, this talk offers a critical examination of a thirteenth-century image of jingluo 經絡, or meridians, and considers it within the epistemological frameworks of global East Asian medicine. Drawing on analytical approaches from science studies, visual culture, and medical humanities, it traces the aesthetic, conceptual, and political dimensions of these anatomical images across premodern, modern, and contemporary periods.
 
Nerve model and weeping woman, 17th century. Unknown engraver, engraving

 

Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis, November 21, 3:35pm

Biology and History, University of Florida

Title: Carl Sagan, The Encyclopedia Britannica, and the Meaning of “Life” in the Mid-Twentieth Century
 
Abstract: This paper explores the attempt to come to terms with the meaning of “life” in the mid-twentieth century by focusing on one particularly important attempt to define “life” for the Encyclopedia Britannica. The completed entry, written by Carl Sagan, remained one of the most popular sources on “life” for an international audience of readers in the middle decades of the twentieth century; it was certainly the source of much pride for Sagan who viewed it as a crowning achievement at that point in his career. This paper explores the contents of the entry, and Sagan’s rather unique, and synthetic perspective in formulating the entry, in light of critical developments in the biological sciences in the 1940s and the 1950s that included the evolutionary synthesis, the Miller-Urey experiment, and the articulation of the structure of DNA. How these developments played out in the context of emerging disciplines like exobiology, along with the wider context that included the Cold War, and the search for the “biological other,” will be examined in this talk.
 
Betty

 

Renée Fox, December 5, 3:35 p.m.

Literature, UC Santa Cruz
 
Title: Reanimating the Dead in the Nineteenth Century
 
A Charles E. Culpeper Lecture in the History of Medicine
 
Abstract: From the late 18th century, when public experiments with galvanism became sensational spectacles for British audiences, to the late 19th century when electrical devices became quack cures for fading vitality, British poets and novelists fantasized about the possibilities and perils of electricity bringing the dead to life. This talk explores the literal and metaphorical acts of reanimation that emerge in gothic novels, nationalist poems, dramatic monologues, philosophical satires, and even realist fictions, arguing that 19th-century writers used the language of electricity to scrutinize the historical, aesthetic, and ethical value of corpses living again in the present moment. 
 
Book cover of The Necromantics: Reanimation, the Historical Imagination, and Victorian British and Irish Literature